US Election 2016

GhostOfAmazon · #**419** 05-20-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesNorth101

When you say in certain states it's already abolished, are there no guns sold there? Or are they just a bit harder to get hold of than in other states?

Being abolished to me would read as guns cannot be sold at all. That was something I did not know that was possible in the US. Being harder to get hold of yes due to tight control on who they get sold to yes, being impossible to get hold of no.

Believe me, prior to this election, I too believed it "impossible" for the Bill of Rights or US Constitution to be infringed upon.

Here are examples of how Hillary will make it possible:

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

As you can see, Hillary has made her plans clear NUMEROUS times and made explicit statements over and over again. This was not a mistake, it was not a slip of the tongue. It is a well thought out plan to disarm the American public.

She scares me more than any socialist ever could.

yankee · #**420** 05-25-2016

FBI just released a statement that Hillary Clinton has not been cooperative nor her aids and has violated security procedures.

Criminal investigation is now ongoing after the Security Breach Audit.

Payelectronica · #**421** 05-25-2016

On the rare occasions that I stop, look and listen to politicians, pundits and news about politics, all I see and hear is theatre. I think WWE or something like that. Not really real.
Think about it like this: if we here on the forums are STEALTH in our ways of conducting business, why wouldn't the most powerful people in the world do the same. They don't want to be seen either. The want to give as little information out as possible about who they are and what they are really doing and how much they make doing it. You can't even see real power. So when I see politicians on television talking about what they are going to do then I know I'm looking at someone with no real power. Even if It's the president of the United States.

GhostOfAmazon · #**422** 05-25-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payelectronica

On the rare occasions that I stop, look and listen to politicians, pundits and news about politics, all I see and hear is theatre. I think WWE or something like that. Not really real.
Think about it like this: if we here on the forums are STEALTH in our ways of conducting business, why wouldn't the most powerful people in the world do the same. They don't want to be seen either. The want to give as little information out as possible about who they are and what they are really doing and how much they make doing it. You can't even see real power. So when I see politicians on television talking about what they are going to do then I know I'm looking at someone with no real power. Even if It's the president of the United States.

Doesn't matter.

Just like us, (to use your example) regardless of whether or not the "power is real" or not, they have to keep up every APPEARANCE of real power, otherwise, there are consequences. Just like eBay will ban us if they find out we are running stealth accounts, so to do the politicians have to keep up the facade (if indeed that is what it is).

You aren't a criminal until you get caught.

Payelectronica · #**423** 05-25-2016

Everything that I take in leads me to conclude its facade. Democrat, Republican all the same.

GreenBean · #**424** 05-25-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payelectronica

Everything that I take in leads me to conclude its facade. Democrat, Republican all the same.

Sadly it is also known as

Democracy!

Or fool the people most of the time for some of the time the fooler will be in Office and/or power.

Richard Milhouse Nixon, for example.
Jimmy Carter

rsot · #**425** 05-25-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payelectronica

Everything that I take in leads me to conclude its facade. Democrat, Republican all the same.

A chilling view of ambivalence

GhostOfAmazon · #**426** 05-25-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payelectronica

Everything that I take in leads me to conclude its facade. Democrat, Republican all the same.

LOL are you one of those loons that think Trump was paid to install Hillary to the Whitehouse?

Payelectronica · #**427** 05-26-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by GhostOfAmazon

LOL are you one of those loons that think Trump was paid to install Hillary to the Whitehouse?

No not at all. I pay very little attention to what's in the media especially when it comes to politics and so I didn't know there were loons who believe that. I don't like or dislike any of them. From the outside looking in its all quite funny to me.

It's all a facade. If you have a stealth account your account is a facade. How many stealthers list an item on a page at one price with certain shipping etc. then list same item again with different account at slightly different price to create the illusion of choice?
Republican vs Democrat = illusion of choice. At least with my calculator.
I don't see Democratic Congressman and Senators or Republican Congressman and Senators, I see millionaires.

And as I stated earlier, I don't like or dislike them I'm just saying that I see huge numbers on my left and my right who are all worth millions.

jeffweico · #**428** 05-26-2016

I am not going to get into who SHOULD be President....

But I have a prediction. It is just MY prediction, mind you, but I think Trump will be the next President, for better or for worse.

The most recent polls say Trump and Hillary are now in a dead heat. By November, he could be up by 20 points. Hillary has a lot of baggage and a lot of people simply do not like her - in fact some people very passionately hate her. And you know that the negative ads are going to be running nonstop from now until November. Every issue she has had will come up again and again and again. Now, you might argue as to whether those issues are real issues, or whether or not it is fair, but the fact remains that she will have to deal with them. Not that I think Trump will get a free pass, mind you, they are going to hit him hard on everything from his tax returns, to his bankruptcies to Trump University, but the problem is that - on a superficial level - Trump is a likable guy. So that puts Hillary at a disadvantage.

I just see too many negatives on Hillary's side for her to win in November. But I could be wrong.

yankee · #**429** 05-26-2016

I believe that I just heard that Trump and Sanders are entertaining a debate next week in California? LOL This very well may be the most unique election cycle in modern democratic history

GreenBean · #**430** 05-26-2016

-- Mind boggling! --

Bernie Sanders Agrees to Debate Donald Trump - NBC News

yankee · #**431** 05-26-2016

Trump and Bernie have similar ultimate goals for people of the USA. They have a complete polar opposite idea of how to reach these goals so we are going to have a very entertaining and meaningless debate. Love it!

Well, if the FBI moves rapidly, it is possible Clinton will not be qualified to be president elect so maybe it is not as meaningless as it seems.

Best way to flip Bernie fanatics/millennials to Trump.

**aspkin** · #**432** 05-28-2016

I'll leave this here...

GhostOfAmazon · #**433** 05-29-2016

The brilliant thing about him is how he gets photos taken eating average people food....for example, after he got to 1237 delegates, becoming the official nominee, he celebrated with.....a Big Mac and Diet Coke from McDonalds.

Whether he eats there or not, the image it portrays is brilliant....

JamesNorth101 · #**434** 05-29-2016

He doesn't know how to cook a steak correctly though!

phaz0rz · #**435** 05-29-2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by yankee

I believe that I just heard that Trump and Sanders are entertaining a debate next week in California? LOL This very well may be the most unique election cycle in modern democratic history

I know I'm late, but I'm pretty sure it was called off, lol.

Trump to Sanders: Sorry, I don't debate people who don't win

rsot · #**436** 05-29-2016

Funny how Trump said he doesn't debate with second best a.k.a losers hah

GhostOfAmazon · #**437** 05-29-2016

What's really sad is that Clinton is only winning do to election fraud...

JamesNorth101 · #**438** 05-29-2016

Do you have proof of that GOA? I would be interested in reading the sources as electoral fraud last I saw in the US was very low. Things like that often are hearsay but if there is hard evidence that would make for great reading!

Trump v Sanders would have been one very interesting contest. Really very different in so many way, but both trying to achieve the same goal

yankee · #**439** 05-29-2016

Tons of voter fraud over the past several elections. Often critical counties/territories will show a 118% turnout for a democrat candidate.

Democrats are incredibly vile about no voter ID cards for this very reason under the name of racism. No intelligent person finds a FREE government ID supplied to anyone as racist except for democrats looking for abnormally high voter turnout or so it seems......

GreenBean · #**440** 05-29-2016

Florida does not have a great track record for voting returns.