Re: SoftEther VPN Client for Linux Quote:
Originally Posted by empirestate
(Post 864072)
My advice is not you Softether. It is a weak system. There's better ways... | We have conducted the performance test at a laboratory at Graduated School of Computer Science at University of Tsukuba in the end of 2012.
We had 5 protocols to test: SoftEther VPN, L2TP/IPsec, SSTP, OpenVPN (Layer-3 mode) and OpenVPN (Layer-2 mode). We tested both our SoftEther VPN Server implementation and existing implementation by Microsoft Corporation or OpenVPN Technologies, Inc. to evaluate SoftEther VPN's performance. The testing environment was: Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 on Intel Xeon E3-1230 3.2GHz and Intel 10 Gigabit CX4 Dual Port Server Adapter. SoftEther VPN Protocol achieved 980Mbps by using SoftEther VPN Server. L2TP/IPsec Protocol resulted 614Mbps by SoftEther VPN Server, while resulted 593Mbps by Microsoft's Windows Server 2008 R2's Routing and Remote Access service (RRAS). SSTP resulted 737Mbps by SoftEther VPN Server, while resulted 715Mbps by Microsoft' s Windows Server 2008 R2. OpenVPN (L3) resulted 89Mbps by SoftEther VPN Server, while resulted 76Mbps by OpenVPN's original implementation. OpenVPN (L2) resulted 90Mbps by SoftEther VPN Server, while resulted 83Mbps by OpenVPN's original implementation.
As the results, SoftEther VPN Server was faster 103.5% than Microsoft's Windows implementation in L2TP/IPsec, faster 103.0% than Microsoft's Windows implementation in SSTP, and faster 108-117% than OpenVPN's original implementation.
Moreover, our SoftEther VPN Protocol (Ethernet over HTTPS, described at the section 1.1) resulted 980Mbps, which is 159.6% faster than L2TP/IPsec Protocol, 175.2% faster than SSTP Protocol and x9.8 times faster than OpenVPN Protocol. |