Its bad to the bone yea .. i've been in most situations with them, not one this sly though.
I'm a ninja apprentice of stealth as you will know, my battles are ahead .. but their mind f's are no match still, i always know whats afoot by the act they put on. It sounds like the standing they put themselves on here is .. ( similarly to earlier ) .. 'we are thinking of keeping the money .. sue us, but you cant'.
That is still a dangerous attitude for them to be strutting, .. and they know it it .. a PP with lots of neck but a feeble mind might be ambitious of this trove though .. how bad has unethical behaviour & performance chart fever got in that place now?. Someones quite possibly got a career and promotion dildo stuffed up their butt related to the gathering in of loose and stray monies like these, engineering it as well no doubt.
Someone more used to stealth accounts must know this scene .. but the science of what to do in this position with such money in the balance is serious. It has to be considered that there is more than just their pull over high withdrawl, but the most logical conclussion might be that they can still only suspect. How to stop them pulling a blag would be my problem if my money .. go in big time = bad .. too soft & passive= bad.
They havent got a leg to stand on in attempt to take this cash, their own shady bearly legal method of being a web bank thing is responsible where the lack of legality goes in ceasing this money, but somehow you've got to firmly state ur case for its return.
Should they also suspect your account is moody .. is irrelevant, there is no words in that agreement that says they can commit either piracy or assume themselves as a salvage merchant of dosh over trifles concerning the fabric of the account you run.
Again AK .. sorry for this plight   | 
