Louis Vuitton, Tiffany, and other trademark lawsuits against EBAY - Page 2 - eBay Suspended & PayPal Limited Forums
eBay Suspension & PayPal Limited Forums  
Join Today
Register Subscribe
     

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


Go Back   Home > Platform Discussions > eBay Discussion!

eBay Discussion! EBay Forum. News, Updates, or Anything eBay is Welcome. A kind of lounge if you will.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #23  
Old 06-30-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 224
Thanks: 10
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 94%
iTrader: (0)
Default

^^^
Same

Although 60M for ebay is pocket change. Considering that they earn Billions annually, 60M is not much.
Reply With Quote
The complete step-by-step guide to get back to selling today!

  #24  
Old 06-30-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 111
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 93%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Yeah I believe this is a typical example of karma! But because ebay is a huge company they just get away with it, upsets me that a sole trader gets banged up for selling a ⊗⊗⊗⊗ because he wants to make a little money on the side however a company such as ebay gets away with it and knows EXACTLY they are ⊗⊗⊗⊗ on there service! It just seems there is two sets of rules 1 rule for ebay and another rule for joe blog!

Last edited by Modee; 07-01-2008 at 08:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-30-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 95%
iTrader: (0)
Default Louis Vutton, Tiffany, and other trademark lawsuits against EBAY

I like to repeat things that have already been posted, because I'm not very adept at using the search function. So anyway, here goes:

Ebay ordered to pay $61 million by a French Court for selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton brand. Read this Link from the NYtimes

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/te...l?ref=business

Last edited by Modee; 07-14-2008 at 12:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-30-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 95%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Here is the entire articles in case you dont' want to register with the NYtimes. Good Statistics: last year Ebay suspended 50,000 sellers and blocked 40,000 previously suspended sellers from returning to the service.
---------------------------------------------

EBay Ordered to Pay $61 Million in Sale of Counterfeit Goods

By DOREEN CARVAJAL (the NYTIMES)
Published: July 1, 2008
PARIS — EBay said it would appeal a French court’s order that it pay 38.6 million euros ($60.8 million) in damages to the French luxury goods company LVMH, the latest round in a long-running legal battle over the sale of counterfeit goods on the Internet.

Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image

Antoine Antoniol/Bloomberg News
Pierre Gode, an LVMH adviser, outside of court.

Related
Tiffany and eBay in Fight Over ⊗⊗⊗⊗ (November 27, 2007)
Times Topics: eBayLVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, a maker of high-end goods and fashion and luxury products, successfully challenged eBay for a second time in the French court, arguing that 90 percent of the Louis Vuitton bags and Dior perfumes sold on eBay are ⊗⊗⊗⊗.

The court ruled Monday that eBay, which earns a commission on the sales, was not doing enough to stamp out counterfeit sales. The decision, while costly, is unlikely to have a drastic effect on the way eBay conducts business because it has already made changes to police its site for counterfeit goods. As eBay moves to more fixed-price marketplaces, it wants access to brand-name products for the cachet and the revenue those brands can bring.

EBay said in a brief statement issued after the decision that the case went beyond counterfeiting to include manufacturers proscribing the territories in which its products could be sold.

“When counterfeits appear on our site we take them down swiftly, and today’s ruling is not about our fight against counterfeiting,” eBay said. “It’s about an attempt by LVMH to protect uncompetitive commercial practices at the expense of consumer choice and the livelihood of law-abiding sellers that eBay empowers every day. We will fight this ruling on their behalf.”

EBay has faced several legal challenges in France, where luxury goods companies are fiercely protective of their brands. In another recent case, a court ordered eBay to pay 20,000 euros to Hermès International in Paris for not properly vetting the sale of handbags.

That court concluded that eBay was not doing enough to combat counterfeit sales and should be forcing sellers to post more product information to guarantee authenticity.

For the first decade of its existence, eBay tried to avoid the counterfeiting problem, asking companies to monitor auctions of their products and send them notices on items they thought were fraudulent. That frustrated rights-holders, who had to spend time and money scouring the site, particularly when counterfeiting exploded after the company expanded to China in 2004.

A result was lawsuits. In 2004, Tiffany & Company fired the first salvo, suing eBay in New York after concluding that 83 percent of its products sold on the auction site were counterfeit. The outcome of that trial is still pending.

In January 2007, after being sued again in Paris by Moët Hennessy over Louis Vuitton handbags, eBay changed course on counterfeiting. Under the rules introduced then, eBay sellers in a certain number of critical categories, like luxury goods and clothing, were limited on the number of items they could sell and could not hold the shorter one-day auctions, a favorite of swindlers who hope to take their money and disappear. EBay also introduced geographical restrictions, preventing sellers in China and Hong Kong, for example, from listing those items at all.

EBay also began delaying some listings from being published to the site to give its employees time to review the items. That tactic has ended up aggravating many honest sellers, who complain the delay cuts into their profits. EBay now says it has over 2,000 people worldwide to tackle counterfeiting and that 95 percent of fraudulent listings are removed before the auction ends. The company also said that last year it suspended about 50,000 sellers and blocked 40,000 previously suspended sellers from returning to the service.

Brad Stone contributed reporting from Boston.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-30-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (2)
Default

I would say they deserve it...but at the end of the day the sellers are the one's who is gonna be punished! I wonder what they will do next.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-01-2008
Jonas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,958
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 98%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Lots of people have reported new york times to google for cloaking for years and years, but google just lets them get away with it. They are usually #1 google result because of their cloaking, too.

But as for the topic...

Firstly, the companies state a figure about how many counterfits are sold on eBay. Fact is they don't know and have no proof. I don't know why eBay didn't make that clear in court.

How exactly is ebay actually supposed to keep counterfitters off its site aside from aggressively stalking and driving everyone off? If someone is an authorized dealer, you can have them put up papers saying their goods are legit, but that does no good for people who are dropshippers or people who got the item as a gift and are reselling it. And even if eBay verified the sellers, that's still hard to prove.

Last edited by Jonas; 07-01-2008 at 04:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-01-2008
411guru's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 26
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default

What can I say? When you have your own site, you make your own rules.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default

I said this on another thread, But, I am asking again Do you think Louis Vitton really loses money because "us poor folks" buy a ⊗⊗⊗⊗. Or put another way, I f there are no ⊗⊗⊗⊗ being sold ... will Louis Vitton make more money????
I guess I don`t get it. I just do not think that Jessica Simpson is going to buy a Louis Vitton bag off Ebay. Do you???

Last edited by yogarelax; 07-01-2008 at 06:25 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 224
Thanks: 10
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 94%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Well there could very well be some people who chose to buy it off ebay because of the price difference, not to mention they might have been fooled. Another thing to consider is LV's image, like the other member mentioned, most people have ⊗⊗⊗⊗ LV. Their company image can be hurt by ⊗⊗⊗⊗.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 91%
iTrader: (1)
Default

Exactly my point, couldnt get it out like that mind lol
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Well, in case they care.... Their image is still good with Me!!!
{a big zero from the midwest}
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 91%
iTrader: (1)
Default

lol Im in the middle, it has damaged it big time in my eyes, thats why im put off coz every time i see a lv whether it be real it reminds me of ⊗⊗⊗⊗ :/
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-01-2008
411guru's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 26
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Maybe real LV won't get hurt, since people who can't afford real ones, buy ⊗⊗⊗⊗ ones, and they weren't going to buy the real ones anyway.

But, maybe it has been hurt. Maybe people who can't afford to buy the real thing would have saved up their money to buy it eventually. If this is true, then LV has lost millions of potential sales.

When I saw a LV 8 years ago, I was in awe and impressed at the owner. Now since every one who drives a 1977 chevy has one, when I see one, I just assume its ⊗⊗⊗⊗ and it has the opposite effect with me. I'm not in awe, but I just laugh at them.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-01-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 43
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 94%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Great ! I so hope for more such law suits in the future.! I can't help praying this company looses so much money it goes down in the dumps.... then they will start begging everyone to sell on there trash website
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-02-2008
becca073's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 94%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ballsack View Post
Actually it's not hard to police, just don't allow anything with a brand name to be auctioned off on ebay and they've fixed the problem.
If eBay were to do this which would fix the problem they would seriously hurt their profits since 99.9% of everything sold on eBay is ⊗⊗⊗⊗ according to the article.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-03-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (2)
Default

Honestly I think they're just tryna look like they're doing something. They know they can't stop counterfeits. Some counterfeit's are so good you can't tell them from the originals! Only way they do that is if you have to do some outrageous stuff to list brand item's like have a license or something. But then again eBay loses BIG profit.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-03-2008
Jonas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,958
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 98%
iTrader: (0)
Default

eBay's reponse on their website to the whole lawsuit of eBay really underemphasizing how strict they are on VERO, made me realize.

You know, eBay really should have entered into court all the websites and ebay guides complaining on how eBay terms innocent people for no reason over VERO, how eBay doesn't verify rightsholders, how there's lots of ⊗⊗⊗⊗ VERO reports. If eBay did that, they probably would have won.

Aside from banning brand names, what else could ebay realistically do to stop counterfit goods? Did the VERO program not protect ebay at all?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-03-2008
411guru's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 26
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Good point. I am wondering why iOffer hasn't been sued yet. I would venture to say that ioffer's listings are 70% counterfeit. So much so that it has developed a reputation as the number 1 source online to get your ⊗⊗⊗⊗ stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-05-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (2)
Default

So why isnt anyone doing anything to ioffer? meaning, taking any action?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-14-2008
becca073's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 94%
iTrader: (0)
Default EBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

Just saw this news flash on the market trading boards so I googled it and came up with this:

EBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks - San Jose Mercury News
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-14-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 96%
iTrader: (0)
Default

Let The Good Times Roll!!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-14-2008
MU
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 363
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 92%
iTrader: (0)
Default eBay wins counterfeit-sales suit filed by Tiffany By Declan McCullagh, CNET Mon Jul

I don't know how to use the forum search function, and I like to repost the same thing that two others have already done before me today. Anyway, here goes with my old news:

eBay cannot be forced to police its auction listings to identify counterfeit Tiffany & Co. products, a federal judge ruled on Monday in a lawsuit brought by the iconic 171-year-old jewelry company.

eBay wins counterfeit-sales suit filed by Tiffany - Yahoo! News

Ebay is going to be bombarded with ⊗⊗⊗⊗ now.

Last edited by Modee; 07-14-2008 at 03:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Aspkin Group

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Stop the guessing games and learn how you can quickly and easily get back on eBay today!
Read the best selling step-by-step eBay Suspension guide eBay Stealth!
Amazon Suspension? Read Amazon Ghost to get back on Amazon!
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger
no new posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58